关于第二人称是否存在的争论 ,实际源于对人称概念界定的分歧 ,也就是以“观察点”为人称本质 ,还是以“称谓”作为人称标志的问题。其实“观察点”和“称谓”在研究文学作品时各有自己的功能用途 ,也有各自的适用范围。鉴于此 ,我们应该首先对人称的概念加以界定 ,然后使“观察点”和“称谓”各得其所 The controversy over the existence of the second person actually stems from the disagreement on the definition of the person’s name, that is, whether the “observation point” is the essence of person or whether the “title” is used as the person’s mark. In fact, “observation points” and “titles” have their own functional purposes in the study of literary works as well as their respective scopes of application. In view of this, we should first define the concept of person, and then make “observation point” and “title” have their own place