论文部分内容阅读
编辑同志: 我们在审理有一起几个被告人共同侵权的损害赔偿案件,其中有的被告人暂时没有赔偿能力,有人认为,可按照民法通则第一百三十条规定,可先由有履行能力的一人或几人先代为偿付。另一种意见认为,民法通则第一百三十条规定的连带责任是指对侵权的事实、责任范围负连带责任。不是指对共同侵权人各自应承担的赔偿费负连带责任。请问该如何理解民法
Comrade editor: We are hearing a case of joint damages with several defendants. Some of the defendants are temporarily unable to pay for compensation. Some people think that according to Article 130 of the General Principles of Civil Law, One or a few people first pay for it. In another opinion, the joint and several liability as provided for in Article 130 of the General Principles of Civil Law refers to the joint and several liability for the facts and scope of the infringement. Does not mean that the co-infringer should bear the joint and several liability for compensation. How to understand civil law