“关东戏剧”的大旗扯起已经五年。这是臆造妄为还是符合实际?是正确还是谬误?迄今仍各执一端,见仁见智,“实践是检验真理的唯一标准。”结论只能产生于客观事实的考察与分析之后。当然,从总体上说,“关东戏剧”这一概念的内涵较为宽泛,包括的内容较多,因此考察与分析也必定是多方面、多层次的。笔者仅就关东意象化戏剧作粗略的考辨与初步的论析,以求一斑窥全豹,这对研讨“关东戏剧”做为一个流派到底是否存 It has been five years since the banner of “Kanto Drama.” Is this conception imaginary or is it in conformity with reality? Is it correct or fallacious? So far it has its own merits. “Practice is the sole criterion for testing truth.” The conclusion can only come after investigation and analysis of objective facts. Of course, on the whole, the concept of “Kanto Theater” is more connotative in content and includes more contents. Therefore, the study and analysis must also be multi-faceted and multi-level. The author only makes a rough examination and preliminary analysis of the Kanto’s imaginative drama in order to find out how to find out whether this exists as a genre in the study of “Kanto Theater”