论文部分内容阅读
本文认为,卡斯托里亚迪斯与拉康在社会建构论及政治理论上可以展开有益对话,从相近的建构论版本出发,他们得出截然不同的结论。卡斯托里亚迪斯从精神单子的原始意义出发,倾向于赞美创造的瞬间,拉康则从实在与现实的区分出发,强调实在的短缺及人类经历中结构性的异化。拉康对创造力界限(异化维度)的阐释不仅可以避免卡斯托里亚迪斯理论的本质主义、主观主义的缺陷,还可以拓宽创造的维度,为我们充分认识当前政治结构开辟空间。同时,他的缝合点范畴也有助于为当前的激进政治指明方向。
This article argues that Kastoria and DeLang can conduct beneficial dialogues in social constructivism and political theory. From the similar constructivist versions, they come to different conclusions. Starting from the original meaning of the spiritual list, Kastoria spells the moment of praise creation. From the distinction between reality and reality, Lacan emphasizes the real shortage and the structural alienation in human experience. Lacan’s interpretation of the boundary of creativity (alienation dimension) can not only avoid the defects of the essentialism and subjectivism of Kastoria’s Discipline, but also widen the dimension of creation and open up space for us to fully understand the current political structure. At the same time, his stitching range also helps to point the way for the current radical politics.