道德责任的判断和归属在人类生活中占据着一个重要的地位。但是,对于承担责任而必须满足的控制条件,理论家们有着完全不同的设想,其中的一个核心争论涉及道德责任是否要求行动者具有可供取舍的行动方案。H.法兰克福对这个问题的否定回答激起了大量热烈的争议,不相容论者试图从不同的角度来反驳其论证,本文的目的就在于表明其中的一个论证策略(所谓的“闪烁的自由”策略)并不成功。 Judgment and ownership of moral responsibility occupy an important position in human life. However, theorists have entirely different ideas about the control conditions that must be met to assume responsibility. One of the core debates is whether or not moral responsibility requires that actors have actionable options. H. The negative answer to this question in Frankfurt aroused a great deal of heated controversy, and the incompatible theorists attempted to disprove their arguments from different angles. The purpose of this article is to show one of the argumentation tactics (so-called “blinking” Free "strategy) did not succeed.