论文部分内容阅读
冯天瑜的明清文化转型研究属于显学,一直都有学者予以关注和评论,成为冯学研究的第一批成果。1996年笔者曾对华元典精神》所阐述的元典精神及近代转换的理论作了正面的评述1,稍后,邓万春也对是书的价值作了确认2。1998年香港中文大学王煜教授对《明清文化史散论》作了积极的评价3。2001年笔者对《人文论衡》一书《转型篇》中所显现的文化转型理论和史论作了评论4。2004年蒋国保教授在《哲
Feng Tianyu’s study of cultural transformation in Ming and Qing Dynasties belonged to explicit study. Some scholars have always paid attention and commented on it, becoming the first achievement of Feng’s study. In 1996, I once made a positive comment on the spirit of the classic Chinese dictionary and the theory of modern translation as elaborated in the spirit of the Chinese classic dictionary. 1 Later, Deng Wanchun also confirmed the value of the book. 2. 1998 Wang Yu, The Chinese University of Hong Kong Professor of the “theory of the history of Ming and Qing Dynasties,” made a positive assessment of 3 in 2001, the author of “Humanities and Trade,” a book “Transformation” appeared in the theory of cultural transformation and history of the theory made a comment 4. 2004 Jiang National security professor in "philosophy