一节公开课后,评课领导说:“教学效果不错,只是方法老了点儿!”言外之意似乎是老的方法过时了,新的方法才是教改的“嫡传正宗”。这种“唯新论”并非个例。正是这种评价导向使某些一线教师谈“老”色变,在上课的过程中,置教学内容、学生实际于不顾,标新立异,花样翻新,以吸引眼球博取喝彩。一时课堂教学乱象丛生:一个简单易懂的问题,明明几分钟就能弄懂,却偏要探究一节课,还美其名曰培养学生的探究意识;一篇需反复阅读才能领悟的文章,宜采用阅读指导法, After a class was open, the leader of the class commented: “The teaching effect is good, but the method is a bit old!” The implication seems to be that the old method is out of date, and the new method is teaching reform. This “new theory ” is not a case. It is this orientation of evaluation that makes some first-tier teachers talk about “old” discoloration. During the course of class, they set the teaching content, students actually neglect, unconventional, tricks innovation, in order to attract the eye to win applause. A moment of classroom teaching chaos: a simple and easy to understand, obviously can understand a few minutes, but the partial to explore a lesson, but also the United States to cultivate students’ sense of inquiry; an article to be read repeatedly to comprehend , Should adopt the reading guide method,