论文部分内容阅读
《北方文物》1991年第2期刊载的杨雨舒同志《大彝震遣使聘日年代考》一文,关于大彝震两次遣使聘日的年代,根据1950年日本宫内厅书陵部出版的《国书寮典(?)解题》记载的渤海国中台省致日本太政官牒,牒文后面的年款是“咸和十一年闰九月廿五日”,认为金毓黻先生所说的大彝震第一次遣使聘日是在咸和十一年、第二次遣使聘日是在咸和十八年的说法是正确的,不同意朱国忱、魏国忠及陈显昌等人所说的大彝震第一次遣使聘日是在咸和十二年、第二次遣使聘日是在咸和十九年,我完全同意杨雨舒同志的这个看法。但是,他在文中根据孙玉良同志《渤海纪年订补》一文所得山的《新唐书·渤海传》所载九位渤海王“均是即位当年改元”的推论,认为大彝震改元咸和,应在唐文宗太和(按应作“大和”)四年
In the article “Northern Artefacts”, No. 2, 1991, Comrade Yang Yu-shu published the article entitled “The Dayi Shou-hsing Recruitment Date of Japan” Of the “National Book Liudian (?) Problem” recorded in the Central Plains province of Bohai to the Japanese government too much, Ba Wen later years of the year is “salty and eleven years intercalary September 25,” said Mr. Jin Yuguang said Dai Yi Zhen first envoys hired Japan is in the salty and eleven years, the second deportation of Japan is salty and eighteen years is correct, do not agree with Zhu Guochen, Wei Guozhong and Chen Hsien Chang and others said For the first time, the great Yi nationality sent the Japanese to employ Japanese troops for a period of twelve years and the task of sending Japanese troops for the second time was salty and nineteen years. I fully agree with this view of Comrade Yang Yushu. However, according to the corollary of the nine Bohai King contained in “The Book of the New Tang Dynasty and the Bohai Sea” contained in Comrade Sun Yuliang’s “Annals of the Bohai Sea” Should be in Tang Wenzong Taihe (according to “Daiwa”) for four years