论文部分内容阅读
CEPA是中国内地与中国香港、澳门特别行政区之间的更紧密经贸安排协议。CEPA的顺利实施对中国两岸三地自由贸易区的建立具有重大意义。但是CEPA在争端解决方面的规定不完善,现成的机制难以解决CEPA争端,所以应当构建一套争端解决机制。一方面应选择合适的解决争端方式,如协商、司法、仲裁、WTO专家组等;另一方面可以借鉴其他争端解决机制的成功经验。NAFTA的成功经验和在实施过程中暴露的不足,值得CEPA借鉴与充实。
CEPA is an agreement on closer economic and trade arrangements between the Mainland of China and Hong Kong and Macao Special Administrative Regions of China. The smooth implementation of CEPA is of great significance to the establishment of China’s free trade area between the three places. However, CEPA’s dispute settlement provisions are not perfect, and the existing mechanism is difficult to solve the CEPA dispute. Therefore, a dispute settlement mechanism should be established. On the one hand, it is necessary to choose the appropriate means of dispute settlement, such as consultation, judicature, arbitration, WTO panel, etc .; on the other hand, we can learn from the successful experience of other dispute settlement mechanisms. The successful experience of NAFTA and the deficiencies exposed in the process of implementation are worth CEPA’s reference and enrichment.