近年来,有一种“扬袁抑孙”的观点,把孙中山领导的辛亥革命看作“是搞糟了”,认为孙中山制订的《临时约法》和确定的责任内阁制,“是造成民初社会动乱、阁潮迭起、府院之争”的重要原因;把袁世凯从清末到民初施行的政治、经济、文化措施说成是反映了当时社会历史发展的总趋势.对这种观点,我是不敢苟同的. In recent years, there has been a “Yang Yuan-sunsun” point of view. The revolution led by Sun Yat-sen as “a mess”, that Sun Yat-sen’s “Provisional Constitution” and determine the responsibility of the cabinet system “is caused by early Republican society The turmoil, the rise of the tide, the dispute between the government and the government ”; the political, economic and cultural measures that Yuan Shikai implemented from the end of the Qing Dynasty to the beginning of the Republic of China were described as reflecting the general trend of social history at that time. I can not agree