新自由主义经济思潮自20世纪80年代在西方重新兴起,大有成为当今西方经济理论主流的趋势。这一思潮在空前发展中自然也传入中国。近年来新自由主义被中国有些学者做了某种变形,并把“国有”现象与政府管理绝对地等同,似乎弱化政府管理就可以解决像产权矛盾等社会经济问题。本栏目的6位作者都来自中国人民大学经济学院,他们曾共同探讨了政府管理必要性这一问题,认为法治下的社会经济管理应当是政府管理的强化,至于所谓“中国政治的一个悖论现象,国家机构不履行国家职能,而是层层职能机构正在演变为追求各自利益的行为主体”,则要归属另外一些研究范畴,譬如从行政建设方面予以解决。陈勇勤教授的论文主要强调“政府对社会的管理具有永恒性”,认为要区分国家与政府,要理解自治的度和政府管理的度,而与“K域问题”相联系的自由主义与政府管理的争论,关键在于以法制作为判别标准。柴志春、谢洪波、范国英、陶宏伟、王朝旭的论文分别针对中国土地市场、中国企业制度变革、中国股票市场、中国金融、中国社会福利等问题进行了探讨,认为新自由主义不适合中国国情,政府、国有企业全面退出经济舞台不是中国特色市场经济的本质。我们希望这组论文能够推动对政府与社会经济管理问题的进一步研究。 Since the neoliberal economic trend of thoughts reemerged in the West in the 1980s, it has become a trend of the mainstream of Western economic theory today. This trend of thought has naturally also been introduced into China in the unprecedented development. In recent years, neoliberalism has been somewhat deformed by some scholars in China and has absolutely equated “state-owned” phenomena with government management. It seems that weakening government management can solve such social and economic problems as the contradiction of property rights. The six authors in this column are from the School of Economics of Renmin University of China. They jointly discussed the issue of the necessity of government management. They believed that the social and economic management under the rule of law should be strengthened by government administration. As for the so-called paradox of Chinese politics Phenomenon, the failure of state institutions to perform their state functions, but the fact that the layers of functional agencies are evolving into the actors that pursue their respective interests “are subject to other areas of research, for example, administrative construction. Professor Chen Yongqin’s thesis mainly emphasizes that ”the administration of the government has the permanence of social management“, that the distinction between the state and the government is to understand the degree of autonomy and the degree of government management, and the liberalism and government management linked to the ”K-domain problem" The key lies in the legal system as a criterion. The dissertations of Chai Zhichun, Xie Hongbo, Fan Guoying, Tao Hongwei and Wang Zhaoxu respectively discuss the land market in China, the reform of Chinese enterprise system, the stock market in China, the Chinese finance, the social welfare in China and other issues. They think that neo-liberalism is not suitable for China’s national conditions It is not the essence of the market economy with Chinese characteristics that the government and state-owned enterprises withdraw from the economic arena in an all-round way. We hope this group of papers will promote further research on the issue of government and socio-economic management.