论文部分内容阅读
从现代传记学理论的视角针对以美国革命诗人菲利普·弗瑞诺为传主的第二部传记《菲利普·弗瑞诺的政治活动》进行评介,以评介为框架,通过菲利普·弗瑞诺传记的多版本比较梳理展现菲利普·弗瑞诺与美国革命之父们之间的恩怨情仇:弗瑞诺与麦迪逊之间的友情、弗瑞诺与汉密尔顿之间的论争、弗瑞诺与杰斐逊之间的合作、弗瑞诺与华盛顿之间的误解等。福曼撰写的这部学术传记《菲利普·弗瑞诺的政治活动》充分利用报刊、书信、传记和诗歌等材料,一一披露并论证了他们之间的恩怨情仇及是非曲直,纠正了历史的偏见,给予弗瑞诺公正的评价。该传记史料性有余,文学性不足,与其它传记不同,该传记在传主生平的基础上紧紧围绕弗瑞诺的历史地位进行叙述并阐释,主题比较突出。
From the perspective of modern biographical theory, the second biography Biographies of Philippine Freeman, the revolutionary biography of American revolutionary poet, is reviewed. Versions of Multiple Versions Reveal Fury Between Phillip Fredon and the Fathers of the American Revolution Vengeance: The Friendship Between Fredon And Madison, The Debate Between Fredon And Hamilton, The Relationship Between Fredon And Jefferson Cooperation between France and Washington and misunderstanding between Washington and Washington. The academic biography “Phillip Freino’s Political Activities” by Forman makes full use of materials such as newspapers, letters, biographies and poems, disclosing and demonstrating the mutual antagonisms and merits between them and correcting the historical Prejudice, give Fredon a fair evaluation. The biography is more than historical and literary, and unlike other biographies, the biography narrates and interprets Freuenpras’ historical status based on the biography of the main biography, with a prominent theme.