论文部分内容阅读
在梳理科学社会学理论传统的基础上,布迪厄将科学场域的客观结构及运行法则、科学活动者的惯习与实践,呈现在反思视野下。“纯”科学资本与制度化资本、科学权威与世俗权力的差异促生了科学场域中自律与他律的张力。为抵抗他律性入侵,必须坚守科学场域的入场费标准,将场域的运作规则公开化与形式化,知识分子群体必须摆脱行会主义及自我优越感,利用自己的科学权威对社会现实发挥影响。自觉的反思态度与批判意识使布迪厄倾向于质疑科学活动得以施行的规范性前提,将其转化为场域、资本与惯习的产物,在深层逻辑上隐含着相对主义的潜在倾向。布迪厄的反思性事业是其社会出身、人生经历、学术历程的产物,是借助其掌握的资本与权力而从事的科学实践,必须被纳入社会学的反思。
On the basis of combing the theoretical tradition of scientific sociology, Bourdieu presents the objective structure and operational rules of scientific fields and the habits and practices of scientific activists in the perspective of reflection. “Pure ” The difference between scientific capital and institutionalized capital, scientific authority and secular power has given birth to the tension between self-discipline and other disciplines in the field of science. In order to resist the invasion of his law, we must stick to the entrance fee standard in the science field, open and formalize the operation rules of the field, and the intellectuals must get rid of the connotation of socialism and self-superiority and use their own scientific authority to socialize Reality exerts influence. Consciously reflective and critical consciousness led Bourdieu to question the normative premise that scientific activities could be implemented, and to turn it into a product of field, capital and habitus implied the underlying tendency of relativism in deep logic. Bourdieus’s reflective career is a product of his social origin, life experience and academic history. It is a scientific practice engaged in using capital and power at his disposal and must be incorporated into sociological reflection.