论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨围绝经期妇女保健干预的临床意义。方法:选取2009年12月-2010年12月本妇幼保健院登记在案的围绝经期妇女105例,采取电脑随机分组的方式分成观察组53例,对照组52例,对照组不给于任何干预进行空白对照,观察组给予系统化保健干预,比较两组围绝经期妇女的度过更年期时间情况以及心理焦虑情况。结果:观察组度过更年期时间2年以下的38例,2年-4年的12例,4年以上的3例,平均时间为(2.58±0.25)年,对照组度过更年期时间2年以下的11例,2年-4年的32例,4年以上的9例,平均时间为(3.86±0.42)年,对照组度过更年期平均时间显著长于观察组,并且具有显著性差异,(t=25.1445,P<0.05),有统计学意义;观察组在严重焦虑、焦虑比例上均显著高于对照组,并具有显著性差异,P<0.05,有统计学意义。结论:给予围绝经期妇女进行系统化保健干预,可以有效缩短围绝经期妇女的更年期时间,并且降低围绝经期妇女的精神焦虑程度,值得各基层医疗机构组织推广。
Objective: To investigate the clinical significance of health intervention in perimenopausal women. METHODS: A total of 105 perimenopausal women were enrolled in this hospital from December 2009 to December 2010. The patients were randomly divided into observation group (n = 53) and control group (n = 52). The control group Interventions blank control, the observation group to give systematic health intervention, compared the two menopausal women over menopause time and psychological anxiety. Results: In the observation group, there were 38 cases with menopause time less than 2 years, 12 cases with 2 years - 4 years and 3 cases with more than 4 years, the average time was (2.58 ± 0.25) years, and the control group had menopause time less than 2 years , The average time was 3.86 ± 0.42 years, the mean time of menopause in the control group was significantly longer than that of the observation group, and there was a significant difference (t = 25.1445, P <0.05), with statistical significance; the observation group was significantly higher than the control group in severe anxiety and anxiety ratio, with significant difference (P <0.05, statistically significant). Conclusion: The systematic health care intervention for perimenopausal women can shorten the menopause time of perimenopausal women and reduce the mental anxiety of perimenopausal women, which is worth to be promoted by the primary medical institutions.