论文部分内容阅读
通过比较制度逻辑、公众偏好和外部条件对荷兰三个领域的社会政策演进所产生的影响,本文分析并解释了社会政策的回应性。本文聚焦于近15年来社会救助、劳动力市场规制、庇护工作这三项社会政策领域中的制度发展,并将关于制度变迁的外源性解释和内源性解释整合在一起。从而表明,对于制度演变过程的分析和解释,需要深入分析政策领域中公众偏好、制度逻辑和外部条件之间的相互作用。对实践工作者的启示目前世界上的很多国家都在改革他们的福利制度。通常这些改革过程都是遵循内部重要的利益相关者的理念和意见,以此为制度逻辑而设计的。此外,启动改革的决策也立足于内部制度的视角。本文强调了在制度改革过程中考虑外部条件的重要性。这表明,三种不同的逻辑能够而且应该融入改革进程的设计与执行当中,通过对比荷兰福利体制中三个制度改革的案例,这一点也得到了证实。
By comparing the impact of institutional logic, public preferences and external conditions on the evolution of social policy in three areas in the Netherlands, this paper analyzes and explains the responsiveness of social policies. This article focuses on institutional development in the three social policy areas of social assistance, labor market regulation and sheltering in the past 15 years, and integrates exogenous and endogenous explanations on institutional changes. This shows that the analysis and explanation of the evolution of the system requires an in-depth analysis of the interaction between public preferences, institutional logic and external conditions in the policy area. Implications for Practicing Workers Many countries in the world are currently reforming their welfare systems. Often, these reform processes follow the ideas and opinions of important internal stakeholders and are designed for institutional logic. In addition, the decision to start the reform is also based on the perspective of the internal system. This article emphasizes the importance of considering external conditions in the process of institutional reform. This shows that three different kinds of logic can and should be integrated into the design and implementation of the reform process, as evidenced by the comparison of the three institutional reforms in the welfare system in the Netherlands.