论文部分内容阅读
目的 比较血清sIgE与抗原皮试在过敏性疾病患者的临床应用价值。方法 10 0例过敏性疾病患者 ,选取屋尘 (housedust)、尘螨 (dustmite)、苋科花粉 (pigweed)、蟑螂 (cockroach)、蛾(moth)、蚕丝 (silk)、蜜蜂 (bee)、虾 (shrimp)、蟹 (crab)等 9种抗原进行皮试和 (或 )血清sIgE的检测 ,比较两种方法的阳性符合率、阴性符合率及一致率。结果 9种抗原中 ,阳性符合率、阴性符合率及一致率均显著高于不相符者。结论 本研究说明皮试与血清sIgE检测是明确过敏性疾病病因的方法 ,也提示解决抗原地区性差别的必要性
Objective To compare the clinical value of serum sIgE and antigen skin test in patients with allergic diseases. Methods One hundred and ten patients with allergic diseases were selected from the group consisting of housedust, dustmite, pigweed, cockroach, moth, silk, bee, (shrimp), crab (crab) and other 9 kinds of antigen skin test and (or) serum sIgE detection, comparison of the two methods of positive coincidence rate, negative coincidence rate and consistency. Results Among the nine antigens, the positive coincidence rate, the negative coincidence rate and the coincidence rate were significantly higher than those of the non-coincident ones. Conclusion This study shows that the skin test and serum sIgE test is a clear method of etiology of allergic diseases, but also prompted the need to address the regional differences in antigen