目的 探讨在消化性溃疡护理中舒适护理的应用效果?方法 本次研究从2018年6月至2019年6月在本院收治的患者中选取206例消化性溃疡患者为研究对象，用信封抽签法随机分组，研究组(103例)采用舒适护理，主要包括环境护理?心理护理?腹痛护理?饮食护理及康复护理;常规组(103例)采用一般性护理，主要包括基础护理?用药护理?饮食护理?健康护理，比较两组临床症状改善率?复发率?溃疡总愈合率?并发症发生概率?疼痛情况?生活质量?焦虑和抑郁评分?护理满意度?结果 ①研究组复发率低于常规组，食欲缺乏?腹胀?腹痛各项“,”Objective To explore the application effect of comfort nursing in peptic ulcer nursing. Methods In this study， 206 cases of patients with peptic ulcer were selected from June 2018 to June 2019 in our hospital， and randomly divided into groups by envelope lottery. The study group (103 cases) used comfort nursing， including environmental nursing， psychological nursing， abdominal pain nursing， diet nursing and rehabilitation nursing. Routine group (103 cases) used general nursing， mainly including basic nursing， medication nursing， diet nursing， health nursing， clinical symptom improvement rate， recurrence rate， total healing rate of ulcer， probability of complications， pain， quality of life， anxiety and depression score， nursing satisfaction between the two groups were compared. Results (1)The recurrence rate of the study group was lower than that of the routine group， and the improvement rate of the symptoms of anorexia， abdominal distention and abdominal pain was higher than that of the routine group， with statistical significance (P<0.05). (2) The study group the total ulcer healing rate was higher than that of the routine group， the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). (3)The total probability of complications in the study group was 1.94% and that in the routine group was 15.53%. There was significant difference in the total probability of complications between the groups (P<0.05). (4)The probability of “frequent pain” in the study group was significantly lower than that in the routine group， and “basically no pain” occurred ， there was significant difference between the two groups (P 0.05); after the intervention， the scores of conscious symptoms， psychological and emotional status， physical physiological function and daily life in the study group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). (6)The SAS and SDS scores of the study group were (33.61±9.15) points and (34.78±8.73) points， respectively， and those of the routine group were (42.29±9.27) points and (43.52±9.04) points， respectively， with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). (7)Nursing satisfaction was 99.03% in the study group and 93.20% in the routine group， the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The severity of peptic ulcer will be affected by both physiological and psychological factors. If the patient has great psychological stress， it will aggravate the condition. The application of comfortable nursing can help to improve the symptoms and psychological state， reduce recurrence rate and improve nursing satisfaction.