论文部分内容阅读
去年3月间,我看到1988年全国十佳新闻摄影记者的作品后,写了两篇评论,短的一篇题为《反映时代风貌与展览脓疮——全国新闻摄影十佳作品之我见》,发表于山东齐鲁晚报;长的一篇题为《商榷与反思——漫评1988年全国十佳新闻摄影记者(作品)评选》,有幸在《中国记者》第7期刊载。《中国记者》同时发表了齐鲁晚报曾刊登的秋田草写的《与以往不同的新闻观——向孙吴先生进言》,即反驳我那篇短文,并加编者按语,希望开展讨论,“以促进新闻摄影改革的深化”。讨论正在进行,现在我想借此机会,先对秋君的“进言”作一答复。“进言”首先否定我对“十佳”“多数作品不佳,基
In March last year, after reading the works of the top 10 press photojournalists in 1988 in China, I wrote two commentary articles shortly entitled “Reflecting the Era of the Times and Exhibitions - The Top Ten Works by National News Photography See ”published in Shandong Qilu Evening News; a long article entitled“ Deliberation and Reflection - Commentary on 1988 Top Ten News Photojournalist (Works) Selection ”, fortunate enough to“ Chinese Journalists ”Issue 7. At the same time, the “China Journalist” published a “different view of the past than ever before” written by Akita Evening News, saying “to Mr. Sun Wu,” that is, to refute my essay and to add editorials and words of hope for discussion. “ Promote the deepening reform of news photography. ” Discussions are going on. Now I would like to take this opportunity to respond first to the “introduction” of Qiu Jun. “Jin Yan” first of all denied me the “top ten” most of the poor works, base