论文部分内容阅读
罗素在他的摹状词理论中,从研究专名开始,即表示殊相的简单符号,而且这个符号没有进一步的符号,从而保证专名直接指向对象。然而指称对象的方式并不都是通过专名,还有摹状词,而为了使摹状词有专名的作用需要对其作出分析。在维特根斯坦看来,专名径直指向对象而没有涵义,而它的意义由殊相的存在决定。逻辑专名在罗素看来,是亲知知识的对象;而普通专名则是伪装的摹状词。摹状词是不完全的符号,不是表达式,它的意义不需要通过特称来获得,只有在句子中才能有意义。维特根斯坦的命题图画的理论受罗素摹状词理论很大的影响。摹状词能否成功指向对象是命题图画理论成功的必要条件。专名与摹状词是否同义、专名与摹状词作用是否相同等都需要在描述理论中作出分析和说明。
Russell in his description of the theory of the word, from the study of the beginning of the name, that is, a simple sign of special phase, and this symbol without further symbols, thus ensuring proper name directly to the object. However, the object of reference is not only through the proper names, but also the descriptions, and in order to make the descriptions of the descriptions of the descriptions need to be analyzed. In Wittgenstein’s view, the proper name points directly to the object without meaning, and its meaning is determined by the existence of each other. The logical proper name, in Russell’s opinion, is the object of knowledge of the benevolent; whereas the ordinary proper name is the disguised description of the form. The description is an incomplete symbol, not an expression. Its meaning does not need to be obtained by the special name, and only makes sense in the sentence. Wittgenstein’s theory of propositional drawings is greatly influenced by the theory of Russell’s descriptions. It is a necessary condition for the successful success of the theory of pictorial representation whether or not the description of the pictorial word is successful. Whether the proper names and descriptions are synonymous or whether the proper names and descriptions are the same or not needs to be analyzed and explained in the description theory.