一、前言最高院在《最高人民法院关于审理侵犯专利权纠纷案件应用法律若干问题的解释》(法释[2009]21号)第四条中规定:对于权利要求中以功能或者效果表述的技术特征,法院应当结合说明书和附图描述的该功能或者效果的具体实施方式及其等同的实施方式,确定该技术特征的内容。最高院的该条规定与专利局在专利审查过程中一直采取 I. Introduction The Supreme People’s Court stipulates in Article 4 of the Interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court on Some Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Cases of Infringement on Patent Disputes (Fame [2009] No. 21) that for the technology expressed by function or effect in the claim Feature, the court should determine the content of the technical feature in combination with the specific implementation manners of the function or effect and the equivalent implementation manners described in the specification and the accompanying drawings. This section of the Supreme Court stipulates that the Patent Office always takes the patent examination process