论文部分内容阅读
唐修《晋书》表明了初唐时期官方对于两晋正统地位的态度,相较于南北朝时期对于东晋正统地位的众说纷纭,《晋书》明确肯定了东晋的正统地位。唐修《晋书》专门以载记这一体例将十六国政权的许多事迹从列传中剥离出来,从史书编纂的技术角度来看表明了唐初史家能够根据史事的特点在史书体例上进行适当的调整,这一做法值得肯定;但是《晋书·载记》在正统观方面却没有太多值得褒扬之处。
The “Book of Jin” by Tang Xiu shows the government’s attitude towards the orthodox position of the two Jin dynasties during the early Tang Dynasty. Compared with the disagreements about the orthodox position of the Eastern Jin dynasty during the Northern and Southern Dynasties, Jin book clearly affirmed the orthodox position of the Eastern Jin Dynasty. Tang Xiu’s “Book of Jin” devoted itself to detaching many of the deeds of the sixteen-nation regime from its transmission in the memorial service. From the technical point of view of the compilation of history books, it shows that historians in the early Tang Dynasty could, according to the characteristics of historical events, Appropriate adjustments, this approach is worthy of recognition; but “Book of Jin” in the orthodox view but not much praiseworthy place.