大概三年前吧,在《南方文坛》上读到一篇《新的文学法则的生成》,文章关注的议题是以《鲤》《最小说》《独唱团》《大方》等为代表的青春文学杂志书,从文学机制的角度讨论这种新鲜事物的特征,辨析围绕着杂志书所呈现的作家的自我想象,也揭橥这一想象的限度(“公共的个人性”)。探索萌芽状态的可能性,这是文学批评的当行本色。文学批评和学术研究(文学理论、文学史研究等)想来是两回事,它当然也离不开广博的学识、深厚的学理,但更需要的是一种初出茅庐的勇气、新鲜的感受力、随时更新的问 About three years ago, I read an article entitled “The Formation of a New Literary Rule” in the Southern Literary World. The topics of concern are the youth represented by “carp,” “the youngest,” “solo group,” and “generous.” Literary magazines discuss the characteristics of this novelty from the point of view of literary mechanisms and the limits of this imagination ( “public personality ”) about the writer’s self-imagination around the magazine book. Explore the possibility of budding, which is the true nature of literary criticism. Literary criticism and academic research (literary theory, history of literary studies, etc.) are two different ways of thinking. Of course, they are inseparable from extensive knowledge and profound theories. What is more needed is a kind of fledgling courage, fresh feeling and always updating Ask