论文部分内容阅读
晚近,在几起涉阿根廷的国际投资仲裁案件中,被申请方阿根廷均援引了《国家责任条款草案》中的危急情况规则和美国—阿根廷BIT中的紧急状态条款进行抗辩并主张免责,各案ICSID仲裁庭却对阿根廷的抗辩作出并不一致的裁决。本文从探究危急情况规则的来源入手,通过分析几起仲裁案件,指出危急情况规则和紧急状态条款在适用于国际投资仲裁时存在的问题。另外,本文针对如何完善中外双边投资协定中的相关规定提出了建议。
Recently, in several international investment arbitration proceedings involving Argentina, the respondent Argentina quoted the emergency rules in the Draft Articles on State Responsibilities and the emergency provisions in the U.S.-Argentine BIT to defend and disclaim the case The ICSID tribunal made a non-conclusive ruling on Argentina’s defense. This article starts with exploring the source of the rules of emergency and analyzes the cases of several arbitration cases and points out the problems existing in the application of the provisions of emergency rules and emergency provisions in international investment arbitration. In addition, this article gives suggestions on how to improve the relevant provisions in the BITs between China and foreign countries.