Since the mid-1980s,Australian governments have focused on expanding community and home-based services for older people.This has led to increased levels of dependency,vulnerability,and complexity to be managed in the community.Consequently,aged care services have had to develop mechanisms for regulating and managing these increased risks,and risk management has become more central to the practices of professional workers in this field.This paper reports on some findings from a large-scale study that explores the way risk management policies have been translated into practice by community-based services in Victoria,Australia.Drawing on interviews with 18 frontline and management professionals employed in community aged care,we found that these workers were wrestling with a diverse and new range of institutional risks beyond those encountered in the actual delivery of frontline care.We found that these workers experienced ‘‘risk’’ in four different contexts,which often created demands for contradictory or conflicting responses.Here we examine these ‘‘contexts of risk practice’’: professional workers’ relationships with their clients,relationships with other service providers,the unregulated nature of the home as a work environment,and community expectations about the management of risk.Despite tensions that frequently arose,workers expressed strong professional commitments to their clients and were motivated to find positive resolutions amid competing interests.We conclude that tensions experienced by workers were embedded in the structural dimensions of institutional relationships and the systematic absence of shared understandings of ‘‘acceptable’’ risks in the community care of older people,rather than in the failure of professional agency.